Category: PHYS 260 Palomar College Successive Resonances Question

Assignment 1 (Individual assessment): Strategic Analysis : Length 1500 words (max), 1.5 line spaced, 12 point Times New Roman. Note: The word count does not include references nor appendices  You will work individually to conduct a strategic analysis, and write a report on a real-life business. Please note that this report will focus on business-level strategy.  You are required to conduct strategic analyses for Coles Supermarkets, a division of Coles Group (Corporation) which is a publicly listed company (https://www.colesgroup.com.au/home/), for this assignment. The focus of this assignment will be on Coles Supermarkets (“Coles” hereafter for short), an Australian supermarket chain. You are advised to conduct research such as Internet searching for industry and media reports, and browsing the website and annual reports of Coles Group  (https://www.colesgroup.com.au/investors/?page=investors) and other relevant organisations.  Write a 1500 word report, excluding references and appendix. In this report, you are required to perform the following tasks:  1. Describe briefly the background information (strategic context) of the corporation and the organisation. This information should be brief and relevant to the discussion of your assignment and thus may include ownership, history, size, business scope, major products/services, and major markets, and financial performance of the organization selected.  2. Conduct a macro-environment analysis (focusing on Coles Supermarkets in this assignment) for the entire industry (The Australian Supermarkets Industry) within which the organisation operates. You should use the analytical framework provided in the textbook. Foci will be placed on the understanding of the purpose of this analysis, the identification of key factors and their implications in terms of key opportunities and threats, and the discussion of their overall impact on the industry growth in the future. Draw your conclusion based on your macro-environment analysis.  3. Undertake an industry (competitive) analysis using Porter’s 5-forces model. You are required to pay attention to the purpose of this analysis, the inter-connectedness of different aspects of the competitive forces, the links between the competitive forces and macro-environment, and their overall impact on the industry and the organization selected in terms of main driving forces in the competitive environment. Draw your conclusions based on your five-force analyses.  References should be utilised within this Report to validate the information presented, and should be drawn from academic sources and organisational information such as the website and annual reports. The business press may be used to identify relevant issues.  Please note that no executive summary is required in this report.  Learning outcome/s and capability development  This assessment is deliberately designed not only to test what you know, but also to build your lifelong learning skills. The skills that you will be developing include:  • cognitive conceptualisation skills  • critical thinking and analysis skills • creative application skills.  All these are valuable skills you will need in future employment. How well you are able to demonstrate these skills and knowledges will impact not only on you and your group (in terms of a mark) but also has the potential to influence the future of the case study organisation. Your work matters.  Specifically, completing this assignment can help you develop your capabilities in the following areas:  • Understanding of the key concepts, models, theories, and analytical concepts covered from the relevant Modules (1-3) in this Course;  • Developing your ability to apply strategic management concepts and theories to the organisation selected, particularly in analysing its strategic position;  • Enhancing your capability in critical think through evaluating existing strategic concepts, analytical frameworks, and theories; and  • Developing your generic skills for pursuing your professional career in the areas of communication and report writing.  Advisory notes for this assignment  • You should conduct an extensive information search on the organisation selected.  • Company websites, annual reports, and media reports are important sources of such information, but their objectives, and thus credibility, should be carefully analysed and evaluated.  • You should use appropriate concepts and analytical tools in your report. • The report should be written in prose; however limited use of dot points is acceptable.  • This advice should be read in conjunction with RMIT assessment policy and the course guide.  Guide for assignment presentation  Written assignments must be presented in a professional format. Quality of presentation, especially literacy, will be considered in the marking criteria. Written communication skills are an essential component of RMIT University’s courses. In line with RMIT policy, all sources of information must be fully referenced using standard Harvard or APA referencing systems. You are encouraged to use referencing software such as Endnote for referencing and formatting. The assignment should be in report format and use Times New Roman font size 12, 1.5 line spacing.

Length 1500 words (max), 1.5 line spaced, 12 point Times New Roman. Note: The word count does not include references nor appendices 
You will work individually to conduct a strategic analysis, and write a report on a real-life business. Please note that this report will focus on business-level strategy. 

You are required to conduct strategic analyses for Coles Supermarkets, a division of Coles Group (Corporation) which is a publicly listed company (https://www.colesgroup.com.au/home/), for this assignment. The focus of this assignment will be on Coles Supermarkets (“Coles” hereafter for short), an Australian supermarket chain. You are advised to conduct research such as Internet searching for industry and media reports, and browsing the website and annual reports of Coles Group 
(https://www.colesgroup.com.au/investors/?page=investors) and other relevant organisations.
 Write a 1500 word report, excluding references and appendix. In this report, you are required to perform the following tasks:
 1. Describe briefly the background information (strategic context) of the corporation and the organisation. This information should be brief and relevant to the discussion of your assignment and thus may include ownership, history, size, business scope, major products/services, and major markets, and financial performance of the organization selected. 
2. Conduct a macro-environment analysis (focusing on Coles Supermarkets in this assignment) for the entire industry (The Australian Supermarkets Industry) within which the organisation operates. You should use the analytical framework provided in the textbook. Foci will be placed on the understanding of the purpose of this analysis, the identification of key factors and their implications in terms of key opportunities and threats, and the discussion of their overall impact on the industry growth in the future. Draw your conclusion based on your macro-environment analysis. 
3. Undertake an industry (competitive) analysis using Porter’s 5-forces model. You are required to pay attention to the purpose of this analysis, the inter-connectedness of different aspects of the competitive forces, the links between the competitive forces and macro-environment, and their overall impact on the industry and the organization selected in terms of main driving forces in the competitive environment. Draw your conclusions based on your five-force analyses.
 References should be utilised within this Report to validate the information presented, and should be drawn from academic sources and organisational information such as the website and annual reports. The business press may be used to identify relevant issues.

 Please note that no executive summary is required in this report. 
Learning outcome/s and capability development 
This assessment is deliberately designed not only to test what you know, but also to build your lifelong learning skills. The skills that you will be developing include: 
• cognitive conceptualisation skills 
• critical thinking and analysis skills
• creative application skills. 

All these are valuable skills you will need in future employment. How well you are able to demonstrate these skills and knowledges will impact not only on you and your group (in terms of a mark) but also has the potential to influence the future of the case study organisation. Your work matters.

 Specifically, completing this assignment can help you develop your capabilities in the following areas:
 • Understanding of the key concepts, models, theories, and analytical concepts covered from the relevant Modules (1-3) in this Course; 
• Developing your ability to apply strategic management concepts and theories to the organisation selected, particularly in analysing its strategic position;
 • Enhancing your capability in critical think through evaluating existing strategic concepts, analytical frameworks, and theories; and 
• Developing your generic skills for pursuing your professional career in the areas of communication and report writing.

 Advisory notes for this assignment 
• You should conduct an extensive information search on the organisation selected. 
• Company websites, annual reports, and media reports are important sources of such information, but their objectives, and thus credibility, should be carefully analysed and evaluated. 
• You should use appropriate concepts and analytical tools in your report. • The report should be written in prose; however limited use of dot points is acceptable.
 • This advice should be read in conjunction with RMIT assessment policy and the course guide.

 Guide for assignment presentation 
Written assignments must be presented in a professional format. Quality of presentation, especially literacy, will be considered in the marking criteria. Written communication skills are an essential component of RMIT University’s courses. In line with RMIT policy, all sources of information must be fully referenced using standard Harvard or APA referencing systems. You are encouraged to use referencing software such as Endnote for referencing and formatting. The assignment should be in report format and use Times New Roman font size 12, 1.5 line spacing.

Read More

Marketing Case Study 1 – 6 pages : ********IVE ALREADY STARTED ON THIS/DO NOT HAVE TIME TO FINISH IT*********** Assignments will be due on Sunday by 11:00 pm CST.  Your assignments should be submitted as MS Word or Excel documents.  Be sure to include your name both in the file and in the file name. Detailed instructions for completing the individual assignments and the grading rubrics are provided in the week assigned. [Adapted from: Simendinger, E. (2003). In Search of a Course Design and Teaching Methods to Improve Critical Thinking. Journal of Health Administration Education, 20(3), 197-213.] Do each case analysis without discussing it with other students prior to class. For online classes instructor will allow students to select two (2) cases for written submission from the case book. For each case, write the following information and number it 1 though 8 and use section headings:  1.       Your name. 2.        Case title, and class date. 3.       A summary of the case. [1 paragraph] This will require you to read the case several times. Do not just copy sentences from the case. Instead, express in your own words the essence of the case. 4.       A list of what you think are the 10-15 most important facts/factors in the case. 5.       The most important health administration/planning/marketing problem/issue to be solved in the case. [1 sentence].            List other secondary problems in the case. 6.       Your recommended solution for the case (a.-d. below).  Make clear specific realistic recommendations. There must be a clear logical sequence to your thoughts and recommendations. [2-3 pages]   a.      At least three possible realistic alternative solutions for the most important problem (stated above for 5).   b.      Criteria to evaluate possible alternative solutions. For example: acceptability to stakeholders, needed resources, legality, timing, cost-effectiveness, ability to implement, side effects, qualifications, statistical data, financial data, ethical considerations, fit with case facts, likelihood of actually solving the problem, etc.    c.      Evaluation of the possible alternative solutions (6a) using the criteria (6b).   d.      Your recommended solution for the problem, based on 6a, 6b, and 6c. Justify your recommendation 7.       Specific MHA tools, methods, techniques, principles, theories, models, etc. from MHA courses that you used for this case. List specific tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, market segmentation, etc.).  Do not list general subjects (e.g., finance, leadership).  8.       Answer any case study questions that accompany the case. If a case question is answered by what you already wrote for 3-7 above, then just note which part of your case analysis provides the answer.  Grades will be based on how well case analyses use case information, MHA tools, and critical thinking to do 3-8 above.  Each case analysis is worth a total of 10 possible points.

********IVE ALREADY STARTED ON THIS/DO NOT HAVE TIME TO FINISH IT***********
Assignments will be due on Sunday by 11:00 pm CST.  Your assignments should be submitted as MS Word or Excel documents.  Be sure to include your name both in the file and in the file name. Detailed instructions for completing the individual assignments and the grading rubrics are provided in the week assigned.
[Adapted from: Simendinger, E. (2003). In Search of a Course Design and Teaching Methods to Improve Critical Thinking. Journal of Health Administration Education, 20(3), 197-213.]
Do each case analysis without discussing it with other students prior to class. For online classes instructor will allow students to select two (2) cases for written submission from the case book.
For each case, write the following information and number it 1 though 8 and use section headings: 
1.       Your name.
2.        Case title, and class date.
3.       A summary of the case. [1 paragraph] This will require you to read the case several times. Do not just copy sentences from the case. Instead, express in your own words the essence of the case.
4.       A list of what you think are the 10-15 most important facts/factors in the case.
5.       The most important health administration/planning/marketing problem/issue to be solved in the case. [1 sentence]. 
          List other secondary problems in the case.
6.       Your recommended solution for the case (a.-d. below).  Make clear specific realistic recommendations. There must be a clear logical sequence to your thoughts and recommendations. [2-3 pages]
  a.      At least three possible realistic alternative solutions for the most important problem (stated above for 5).
  b.      Criteria to evaluate possible alternative solutions. For example: acceptability to stakeholders, needed resources, legality, timing, cost-effectiveness, ability to implement, side effects, qualifications, statistical data, financial data, ethical considerations, fit with case facts, likelihood of actually solving the problem, etc. 
  c.      Evaluation of the possible alternative solutions (6a) using the criteria (6b).
  d.      Your recommended solution for the problem, based on 6a, 6b, and 6c. Justify your recommendation
7.       Specific MHA tools, methods, techniques, principles, theories, models, etc. from MHA courses that you used for this case. List specific tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, market segmentation, etc.).  Do not list general subjects (e.g., finance, leadership).
 8.       Answer any case study questions that accompany the case. If a case question is answered by what you already wrote for 3-7 above, then just note which part of your case analysis provides the answer. 
Grades will be based on how well case analyses use case information, MHA tools, and critical thinking to do 3-8 above.  Each case analysis is worth a total of 10 possible points.

Read More

Marketing Case Study 2 – 6 pages : Assignments will be due on Sunday by 11:00 pm CST.  Your assignments should be submitted as MS Word or Excel documents.  Be sure to include your name both in the file and in the file name. Detailed instructions for completing the individual assignments and the grading rubrics are provided in the week assigned. [Adapted from: Simendinger, E. (2003). In Search of a Course Design and Teaching Methods to Improve Critical Thinking. Journal of Health Administration Education, 20(3), 197-213.] Do each case analysis without discussing it with other students prior to class. For online classes instructor will allow students to select two (2) cases for written submission from the case book. For each case, write the following information and number it 1 though 8 and use section headings:  1.       Your name. 2.        Case title, and class date. 3.       A summary of the case. [1 paragraph] This will require you to read the case several times. Do not just copy sentences from the case. Instead, express in your own words the essence of the case. 4.       A list of what you think are the 10-15 most important facts/factors in the case. 5.       The most important health administration/planning/marketing problem/issue to be solved in the case. [1 sentence].            List other secondary problems in the case. 6.       Your recommended solution for the case (a.-d. below).  Make clear specific realistic recommendations. There must be a clear logical sequence to your thoughts and recommendations. [2-3 pages]   a.      At least three possible realistic alternative solutions for the most important problem (stated above for 5).   b.      Criteria to evaluate possible alternative solutions. For example: acceptability to stakeholders, needed resources, legality, timing, cost-effectiveness, ability to implement, side effects, qualifications, statistical data, financial data, ethical considerations, fit with case facts, likelihood of actually solving the problem, etc.    c.      Evaluation of the possible alternative solutions (6a) using the criteria (6b).   d.      Your recommended solution for the problem, based on 6a, 6b, and 6c. Justify your recommendation 7.       Specific MHA tools, methods, techniques, principles, theories, models, etc. from MHA courses that you used for this case. List specific tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, market segmentation, etc.).  Do not list general subjects (e.g., finance, leadership).  8.       Answer any case study questions that accompany the case. If a case question is answered by what you already wrote for 3-7 above, then just note which part of your case analysis provides the answer.  Grades will be based on how well case analyses use case information, MHA tools, and critical thinking to do 3-8 above.  Each case analysis is worth a total of 10 possible points.

Assignments will be due on Sunday by 11:00 pm CST.  Your assignments should be submitted as MS Word or Excel documents.  Be sure to include your name both in the file and in the file name. Detailed instructions for completing the individual assignments and the grading rubrics are provided in the week assigned.
[Adapted from: Simendinger, E. (2003). In Search of a Course Design and Teaching Methods to Improve Critical Thinking. Journal of Health Administration Education, 20(3), 197-213.]
Do each case analysis without discussing it with other students prior to class. For online classes instructor will allow students to select two (2) cases for written submission from the case book.
For each case, write the following information and number it 1 though 8 and use section headings: 
1.       Your name.
2.        Case title, and class date.
3.       A summary of the case. [1 paragraph] This will require you to read the case several times. Do not just copy sentences from the case. Instead, express in your own words the essence of the case.
4.       A list of what you think are the 10-15 most important facts/factors in the case.
5.       The most important health administration/planning/marketing problem/issue to be solved in the case. [1 sentence]. 
          List other secondary problems in the case.
6.       Your recommended solution for the case (a.-d. below).  Make clear specific realistic recommendations. There must be a clear logical sequence to your thoughts and recommendations. [2-3 pages]
  a.      At least three possible realistic alternative solutions for the most important problem (stated above for 5).
  b.      Criteria to evaluate possible alternative solutions. For example: acceptability to stakeholders, needed resources, legality, timing, cost-effectiveness, ability to implement, side effects, qualifications, statistical data, financial data, ethical considerations, fit with case facts, likelihood of actually solving the problem, etc. 
  c.      Evaluation of the possible alternative solutions (6a) using the criteria (6b).
  d.      Your recommended solution for the problem, based on 6a, 6b, and 6c. Justify your recommendation
7.       Specific MHA tools, methods, techniques, principles, theories, models, etc. from MHA courses that you used for this case. List specific tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, market segmentation, etc.).  Do not list general subjects (e.g., finance, leadership).
 8.       Answer any case study questions that accompany the case. If a case question is answered by what you already wrote for 3-7 above, then just note which part of your case analysis provides the answer. 
Grades will be based on how well case analyses use case information, MHA tools, and critical thinking to do 3-8 above.  Each case analysis is worth a total of 10 possible points.

Read More

Groups and Teams : Group Dynamics and Teams We will continue our experiential approach to the study of Organizational Behavior by engaging in a personal applied case on the topic of group dynamics and teams. As in Module 1, use the following outline to structure your 4- to 6-page paper. You may use the subtitles as headings for your paper. Introduction: Discuss the topic of the paper and how you will approach it. It is best to write this section after you have written the rest of the paper. Concrete Experience: Begin with a specific situation/event. Describe an experience with a group or team that was meaningful to you. It may have been an extraordinarily good experience – or it may have been an experience that did not work out very well at all! The important point is that it should be an experience which you would like to understand better. Be objective and focus on just the facts: who, what, where, when, and how – as if you were composing a newspaper article. Reflective Observation: Reflect upon that experience from multiple perspectives of persons involved or affected in the experience. Step back from the situation, look at the experience from your own viewpoint, and from the perspective of all other parties involved or affected. You want to look at the circumstances surrounding the experience from every relevant point of view. Why did you behave the way that you did? Why did others behave the way that they did? Did others have the same positive (or negative) experience? Explain. (Note: your discussion of theories and models from your module materials belongs in the following section.) Abstract Conceptualization: (This Abstract Conceptualization section is the “heart” of your paper.) Use critical thinking skills to understand and interpret the experience at a deeper, more generalizable level. Interpret and understand the events you have described by drawing on the concepts, theories, and models in the background material from this module. Explain how they apply to your experience. For example, what behavior patterns can you identify in yourself and others that are similar to the ones described in the material on communication, teams, and conflict management? Does the model of Force Field Analysis (home page) help you better understand why people behaved the way they did? Be sure to apply at least three concepts, theories, and/or models and cite all references to concepts, ideas, and/or quotes that you use from any outside source. Active Experimentation: Identify ways to respond to the next occurrence of a similar experience. What have you learned about the way groups work from this analysis? What have you learned from your mistakes? How are you going to put what you have learned to use? What actions will you take to build more effective work teams in your job? Conclusion: Sum up the main points of your analysis and the key learning you are taking from it. Reference List: List all references that you have cited in the paper using APA formatting. References include materials from the required background readings as well as any outside internet or library sources you used in researching and writing your paper.

Group Dynamics and Teams
We will continue our experiential approach to the study of Organizational Behavior by engaging in a personal applied case on the topic of group dynamics and teams. As in Module 1, use the following outline to structure your 4- to 6-page paper. You may use the subtitles as headings for your paper.
Introduction: Discuss the topic of the paper and how you will approach it. It is best to write this section after you have written the rest of the paper.
Concrete Experience: Begin with a specific situation/event. Describe an experience with a group or team that was meaningful to you. It may have been an extraordinarily good experience – or it may have been an experience that did not work out very well at all! The important point is that it should be an experience which you would like to understand better. Be objective and focus on just the facts: who, what, where, when, and how – as if you were composing a newspaper article.
Reflective Observation: Reflect upon that experience from multiple perspectives of persons involved or affected in the experience. Step back from the situation, look at the experience from your own viewpoint, and from the perspective of all other parties involved or affected. You want to look at the circumstances surrounding the experience from every relevant point of view. Why did you behave the way that you did? Why did others behave the way that they did? Did others have the same positive (or negative) experience? Explain. (Note: your discussion of theories and models from your module materials belongs in the following section.)
Abstract Conceptualization: (This Abstract Conceptualization section is the “heart” of your paper.) Use critical thinking skills to understand and interpret the experience at a deeper, more generalizable level. Interpret and understand the events you have described by drawing on the concepts, theories, and models in the background material from this module. Explain how they apply to your experience. For example, what behavior patterns can you identify in yourself and others that are similar to the ones described in the material on communication, teams, and conflict management? Does the model of Force Field Analysis (home page) help you better understand why people behaved the way they did? Be sure to apply at least three concepts, theories, and/or models and cite all references to concepts, ideas, and/or quotes that you use from any outside source.
Active Experimentation: Identify ways to respond to the next occurrence of a similar experience. What have you learned about the way groups work from this analysis? What have you learned from your mistakes? How are you going to put what you have learned to use? What actions will you take to build more effective work teams in your job?
Conclusion: Sum up the main points of your analysis and the key learning you are taking from it.
Reference List: List all references that you have cited in the paper using APA formatting. References include materials from the required background readings as well as any outside internet or library sources you used in researching and writing your paper.

Read More

Research 2 : Please indicate a training topic or two that interests you (scan syllabus for ideas). Consider how the topic relates to your proposed training observation. Next, identify 5 academic references that you intend to read/use as you research the training topic for your paper. Please choose references that ARE NOT ALREADY listed in the syllabus. Draft an APA 7-formatted reference page with the 5 references in *.doc(x) format (including title page)  TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS Spring 2021 Prerequisites: none. Required textbook:  None. Primary source articles and chapters will be made available THROUGH LSU LIBRARIES. Description of Course Content: The goal for this course is to increase your effectiveness in dealing with multiple aspects of organizational training and development – in analyzing needs for training, awareness of training theories, frameworks for developing and evaluating training effectiveness, and understanding the psychological and contextual factors that influence training practices.   The course readings are aimed at expanding awareness and knowledge of multiple issues associated with organizational training and development.  There will be analysis of organizational cases and class activities to emphasize and apply theoretical knowledge. Students should come away from the course with greater knowledge and confidence in the subject area. Student Learning Outcomes. Successful completion of this course will result in the ability to… 1. Understand and explain basic concepts, theories, and issues related to organizational training and development; 2. Apply scientific knowledge about issues and debates presented in the academic literature; and 3. Analyze academic writing and deliver peer feedback in a timely, sensitive, and effectual manner. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS: To be able to participate fully in assignments and exams, you must: Have reliable and speedy internet access – You will be completing all assignments and exams online. Have computer competency – You must be comfortable using email and discussion boards, up/downloading documents, and accessing internet search engines and websites. Participation    10% Reviewer Critiques  20% Final Exam   30% Final Term Paper  40% A+ = 100 – 97, A=96-93, A- =92-90 B+  = 89 – 87,  B=86-83, B- =82-80 C+  = 79 – 77,  C=76-73, C- =72-70   D+  = 69 – 67,  D=66-63, D- =62-60 F+  = 59 – 57,  F=56-53,  F- < 52 All calculations will be carried out to two decimal places; there will be no rounding of final grades.    Participation. There are several activities throughout the semester. They will be graded according to rubrics that explained with each assignment. Collectively, these activities are worth 10% of your grade. Your participation in these activities is critical not only for your personal learning, but also for the learning of your classmates.  Much of the value of the class comes from prepared, thoughtful, and informed dialog between you and your classmates.  You will be evaluated on the timeliness, completion, and quality of your assignments and contributions.  Quality comments include adding new insights to the readings, offering a unique and relevant perspective on the issues, contributing to moving the discussion and analysis forward, extending rather than repeating others’ comments, and demonstrating reflective thinking.  Assignments will be announced on Monday of each week. You will have until the end of the week (Sunday at midnight, i.e., 11:59 PM) to submit your work. These assignments will draw on the required reading, materials, and case studies posted in each week’s Moodle section. Please review these materials to be able to complete the assignments to the best of your ability. If you know in advance you will be late for an activity, you are still responsible for contributing to forum discussions in advance of class (or after if necessary).  This will be a way for you to earn partial participation credit for the assignment. Reviewer Critiques.   The peer-review process is an essential element of the academic scientific process. Not only can access to feedback improve your own capacity to learn, critically analyzing and articulating feedback to others help you to hone your own research and writing skill. Throughout the semester you will be assigned two peer-review assignments. Your abilities to accurately and sensitively evaluate your peer’s work will constitute 20% of your overall course grade.  You will be provided an evaluation form to assist you in the analytic critique of your fellow students’ writing assignments, as well as a rubric that will be used to evaluate the quality of your critique. You will be evaluated on your ability to issue timely, sensitive, and effectual written comments. Reviewer assignments will be announced on Monday mornings; critiques will be due Sunday at midnight. Final Exam. One structured online exam valued at 30% of your grade will be administered on Moodle. The exam will be comprised of multiple choice, true/false, and short-statement items that will assess your ability to understand, analyze, and evaluate applications of key concepts and theories in organizational change management. The exam will cover material presented in the assigned readings and discussed in weekly activities. (See next sections for more detail about missing the exam.) Term Paper.    The Term Paper is the major deliverable for this course. It will be developed in a cumulative fashion with each week’s homework assignment helping to advance thought and written skill in the completion of the term paper. Do the weekly assignments and you’ll have a complete final paper by the end of the term. Drafts will be submitted periodically to allow for opportunities to acquire feedback about the paper. The final term paper will be submitted Sunday (11:59p.m.) April 26th and is worth 40% of your grade. A grading rubric will be made available at the time the paper assignment is announced. The paper should follow this outline:  Observe organizational training practices in situ Apply disciplinary terminology, principles, and theories to describe the training Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the training approach Recommend evidence-based, practical suggestions for improving the training process Identify an organizational training context you wish to observe and critique. Over the course of the semester, conduct two observations of training being administered. These events will serve as your primary data collection method, but you should also include information gathered from the organization’s website, interviews conducted while onsite, and/or other “benchmarking” resources (e.g., government agency, professional association) that may help you to better understand the training history, demands, and norms for the selected job or function.  Refer to existing course material and related academic literature to make use of disciplinary terminology, principles, and related theories. Be sure to cite and provide references for: (a) the empirical support you use to back your assertions, and (b) the conceptual and operational definitions you use when evaluating the training program. The Draft Paper should clearly identify the training context and job title/function being trained. It should provide enough description so that the reader can understand who, what, how, and why training occurs based on your observation and investigation. It should also provide a theoretical basis for interpreting the training (i.e., choose a theory or two to explain what you’ve observed). Citations and references should be included in the draft, which will likely be about 4-6 double-spaced pages in APA format. The grading rubric is described below. The Final Term Paper will incorporate your synthesis across two training observations, and will include a comprehensive assessment of the organization’s approach to Training Needs Analysis, and your training critique using the ADDIE Model as an analytical guideline. You should conclude with recommendations to the organization for how to improve its training program. The final written product will be approximately 12-15 pages in APA format  TIPS:  I expect that your paper will make a number of references to class readings and discussions. While you do not need to footnote, you should cite the reading by putting the author’s name and the date of the publication in parentheses following the reference. Where quotes are used directly, put the page number the quote appears on. A list of all readings you referenced in the paper should appear at the end of the paper.   Use of supplemental material to support the paper: Please include graphs, process flow diagrams, organizations charts, survey results, etc. that help tell the story more vividly. Present these materials in APA format. Use supporting data.  If you make an assertion such as “Morale at my company was at an all-time low,” on what do you base this? If you suggest, “This project has had an enormous impact on customer satisfaction,” how do you know this to be true? While it is acceptable to occasionally insert some subjectivity into the analysis – be clear to identify what is subjective opinion and what is based on more objective data sources.  ASSIGNMENT RULES: (More information about these facets can be found in the COURSE OVERIVEW on Moodle) General Rules: ·  Your computer and connection MUST be reliable. ·  Assignments and graded materials will be available for submission during announced windows of time. Your work must be submitted during those time frames. ·  Once you begin a test, you will be given a certain amount of time to finish it before it “closes” for you. During the times that the test is “open” you WILL be able to revised answers. Academic Integrity: You must work alone and without notes or other resources as you take the exam. Do not discuss test questions with your peers or attempt to copy the test in any way. Violation of this code will result in being reported for academic dishonesty. Report breaches of honesty if you know they have occurred. Missed Assignments: Graded materials must be submitted within the prescribed time frame. The exam and/or activities assignments may be made-up at a later date for full credit provided PS-22 documentation. Such documentation must be provided to Dr. Rizzuto within 48 hours of the missed assignment. The make-up work must be completed without one week of the assignment deadline. Failure to submit a Term Papers or Draft Paper for reasons that are NOT authorized by PS-22 will result in 0% for the graded assignments. Draft or Final Papers that are submitted late will be subject to the following grade deductions:  i.  Immediate deduction of 15 points (out of 100) upon missing the deadline  ii.  A total of 25 points (out of 100) will be deducted for papers submitted within 24 hours of the deadline.  iii.  A total of 35 points (out of 100) will be deducted for papers submitted within 48 hours of the deadline.  iv.  Late papers will not be allowed after 48 hours. Failure to submit papers within 48 hours will result in 0% for the graded assignment Course exercises and activities will be graded within one week of the due date. Course exams and papers will be graded and returned within two weeks of the due date.

Please indicate a training topic or two that interests you (scan syllabus for ideas). Consider how the topic relates to your proposed training observation. Next, identify 5 academic references that you intend to read/use as you research the training topic for your paper. Please choose references that ARE NOT ALREADY listed in the syllabus. Draft an APA 7-formatted reference page with the 5 references in *.doc(x) format (including title page) 

TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS

Spring 2021
Prerequisites: none.

Required textbook:  None. Primary source articles and chapters will be made available THROUGH LSU LIBRARIES.
Description of Course Content: The goal for this course is to increase your effectiveness in dealing with multiple aspects of organizational training and development – in analyzing needs for training, awareness of training theories, frameworks for developing and evaluating training effectiveness, and understanding the psychological and contextual factors that influence training practices.  
The course readings are aimed at expanding awareness and knowledge of multiple issues associated with organizational training and development.  There will be analysis of organizational cases and class activities to emphasize and apply theoretical knowledge. Students should come away from the course with greater knowledge and confidence in the subject area.

Student Learning Outcomes. Successful completion of this course will result in the ability to…
1. Understand and explain basic concepts, theories, and issues related to organizational training and development;
2. Apply scientific knowledge about issues and debates presented in the academic literature; and
3. Analyze academic writing and deliver peer feedback in a timely, sensitive, and effectual manner.
COURSE ASSIGNMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS: To be able to participate fully in assignments and exams, you must:

Have reliable and speedy internet access – You will be completing all assignments and exams online.
Have computer competency – You must be comfortable using email and discussion boards, up/downloading documents, and accessing internet search engines and websites.

Participation    10%
Reviewer Critiques  20%
Final Exam   30%
Final Term Paper  40%
A+ = 100 – 97, A=96-93, A- =92-90
B+  = 89 – 87,  B=86-83, B- =82-80

C+  = 79 – 77,  C=76-73, C- =72-70  
D+  = 69 – 67,  D=66-63, D- =62-60
F+  = 59 – 57,  F=56-53,  F- < 52 All calculations will be carried out to two decimal places; there will be no rounding of final grades.    Participation. There are several activities throughout the semester. They will be graded according to rubrics that explained with each assignment. Collectively, these activities are worth 10% of your grade. Your participation in these activities is critical not only for your personal learning, but also for the learning of your classmates.  Much of the value of the class comes from prepared, thoughtful, and informed dialog between you and your classmates.  You will be evaluated on the timeliness, completion, and quality of your assignments and contributions.  Quality comments include adding new insights to the readings, offering a unique and relevant perspective on the issues, contributing to moving the discussion and analysis forward, extending rather than repeating others’ comments, and demonstrating reflective thinking.  Assignments will be announced on Monday of each week. You will have until the end of the week (Sunday at midnight, i.e., 11:59 PM) to submit your work. These assignments will draw on the required reading, materials, and case studies posted in each week’s Moodle section. Please review these materials to be able to complete the assignments to the best of your ability. If you know in advance you will be late for an activity, you are still responsible for contributing to forum discussions in advance of class (or after if necessary).  This will be a way for you to earn partial participation credit for the assignment. Reviewer Critiques.   The peer-review process is an essential element of the academic scientific process. Not only can access to feedback improve your own capacity to learn, critically analyzing and articulating feedback to others help you to hone your own research and writing skill. Throughout the semester you will be assigned two peer-review assignments. Your abilities to accurately and sensitively evaluate your peer’s work will constitute 20% of your overall course grade.  You will be provided an evaluation form to assist you in the analytic critique of your fellow students’ writing assignments, as well as a rubric that will be used to evaluate the quality of your critique. You will be evaluated on your ability to issue timely, sensitive, and effectual written comments. Reviewer assignments will be announced on Monday mornings; critiques will be due Sunday at midnight. Final Exam. One structured online exam valued at 30% of your grade will be administered on Moodle. The exam will be comprised of multiple choice, true/false, and short-statement items that will assess your ability to understand, analyze, and evaluate applications of key concepts and theories in organizational change management. The exam will cover material presented in the assigned readings and discussed in weekly activities. (See next sections for more detail about missing the exam.) Term Paper.    The Term Paper is the major deliverable for this course. It will be developed in a cumulative fashion with each week’s homework assignment helping to advance thought and written skill in the completion of the term paper. Do the weekly assignments and you’ll have a complete final paper by the end of the term. Drafts will be submitted periodically to allow for opportunities to acquire feedback about the paper. The final term paper will be submitted Sunday (11:59p.m.) April 26th and is worth 40% of your grade. A grading rubric will be made available at the time the paper assignment is announced. The paper should follow this outline:  Observe organizational training practices in situ Apply disciplinary terminology, principles, and theories to describe the training Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the training approach Recommend evidence-based, practical suggestions for improving the training process Identify an organizational training context you wish to observe and critique. Over the course of the semester, conduct two observations of training being administered. These events will serve as your primary data collection method, but you should also include information gathered from the organization’s website, interviews conducted while onsite, and/or other “benchmarking” resources (e.g., government agency, professional association) that may help you to better understand the training history, demands, and norms for the selected job or function.  Refer to existing course material and related academic literature to make use of disciplinary terminology, principles, and related theories. Be sure to cite and provide references for: (a) the empirical support you use to back your assertions, and (b) the conceptual and operational definitions you use when evaluating the training program. The Draft Paper should clearly identify the training context and job title/function being trained. It should provide enough description so that the reader can understand who, what, how, and why training occurs based on your observation and investigation. It should also provide a theoretical basis for interpreting the training (i.e., choose a theory or two to explain what you’ve observed). Citations and references should be included in the draft, which will likely be about 4-6 double-spaced pages in APA format. The grading rubric is described below. The Final Term Paper will incorporate your synthesis across two training observations, and will include a comprehensive assessment of the organization’s approach to Training Needs Analysis, and your training critique using the ADDIE Model as an analytical guideline. You should conclude with recommendations to the organization for how to improve its training program. The final written product will be approximately 12-15 pages in APA format  TIPS:  I expect that your paper will make a number of references to class readings and discussions. While you do not need to footnote, you should cite the reading by putting the author’s name and the date of the publication in parentheses following the reference. Where quotes are used directly, put the page number the quote appears on. A list of all readings you referenced in the paper should appear at the end of the paper.   Use of supplemental material to support the paper: Please include graphs, process flow diagrams, organizations charts, survey results, etc. that help tell the story more vividly. Present these materials in APA format. Use supporting data.  If you make an assertion such as “Morale at my company was at an all-time low,” on what do you base this? If you suggest, “This project has had an enormous impact on customer satisfaction,” how do you know this to be true? While it is acceptable to occasionally insert some subjectivity into the analysis – be clear to identify what is subjective opinion and what is based on more objective data sources.  ASSIGNMENT RULES: (More information about these facets can be found in the COURSE OVERIVEW on Moodle) General Rules: ·  Your computer and connection MUST be reliable. ·  Assignments and graded materials will be available for submission during announced windows of time. Your work must be submitted during those time frames. ·  Once you begin a test, you will be given a certain amount of time to finish it before it “closes” for you. During the times that the test is “open” you WILL be able to revised answers. Academic Integrity: You must work alone and without notes or other resources as you take the exam. Do not discuss test questions with your peers or attempt to copy the test in any way. Violation of this code will result in being reported for academic dishonesty. Report breaches of honesty if you know they have occurred. Missed Assignments: Graded materials must be submitted within the prescribed time frame. The exam and/or activities assignments may be made-up at a later date for full credit provided PS-22 documentation. Such documentation must be provided to Dr. Rizzuto within 48 hours of the missed assignment. The make-up work must be completed without one week of the assignment deadline. Failure to submit a Term Papers or Draft Paper for reasons that are NOT authorized by PS-22 will result in 0% for the graded assignments. Draft or Final Papers that are submitted late will be subject to the following grade deductions:  i.  Immediate deduction of 15 points (out of 100) upon missing the deadline  ii.  A total of 25 points (out of 100) will be deducted for papers submitted within 24 hours of the deadline.  iii.  A total of 35 points (out of 100) will be deducted for papers submitted within 48 hours of the deadline.  iv.  Late papers will not be allowed after 48 hours. Failure to submit papers within 48 hours will result in 0% for the graded assignment Course exercises and activities will be graded within one week of the due date. Course exams and papers will be graded and returned within two weeks of the due date.

Read More